UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant ☑☒

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Webster Financial Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

March 17, 201723, 2018

To the Shareholders of

Webster Financial Corporation:

You are cordially invited to attend the Webster Financial Corporation Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Thursday, April 27, 201726, 2018 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the New Britain Museum of American Art, 56 Lexington Street, New Britain, CT 06052.

At the Annual Meeting, you will be asked: (i) to elect ten directors to serve forone-year terms; (ii) to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster; (iii) to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the year ending December 31, 2017;2018; and (iv) to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the frequency of an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster; and (v) to transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments of the meeting.

We encourage you to read the accompanying Proxy Statement, which provides information regarding Webster and the matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. Also enclosed is our 20162017 Annual Report.

It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote your common shares via a toll-free telephone number or on the Internet or you may complete, date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you attend the meeting and prefer to vote in person, you may do so.

WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Webster Plaza

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

800-325-2424

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON

APRIL 27, 201726, 2018

To the Shareholders of

Webster Financial Corporation:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVENthat the annual meeting of shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Webster Financial Corporation (“Webster”) will be held on Thursday, April 27, 201726, 2018 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the New Britain Museum of American Art, 56 Lexington Street, New Britain, CT 06052, for the following purposes:

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 27, 201726, 2018 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on that date will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Waterbury, Connecticut

March 17, 201723, 2018

IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU VOTE PROMPTLY. THEREFORE, WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, PLEASE VOTE YOUR COMMON SHARES VIA THE TOLL- FREETOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER LISTED ON THE PROXY CARD, THE INTERNET OR BY MAIL.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to Be Held on April 27, 2017:26, 2018: This Proxy Statement, along with our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162017 and our 20162017 Annual Report, are available free of charge on the Investor Relations section of our website (www.wbst.com)(www.wbst.com).

WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Webster Plaza

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

800-325-2424

PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON APRIL 27, 201726, 2018

Solicitation, Voting and Revocability of Proxies

This Proxy Statement (the “Proxy Statement”) is being furnished to the shareholders of Webster Financial Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Webster” or the “Company” or the “Corporation”), as part of the solicitation of proxies by its Board of Directors from holders of its outstanding shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Webster to be held on Thursday, April 27, 201726, 2018 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time, at the New Britain Museum of American Art, 56 Lexington Street, New Britain, CT 06052 (the “Annual Meeting”) and at any adjournments thereof. The Proxy Statement, together with the enclosed proxy card, is being mailed to shareholders of Webster on or about March 17, 2017.23, 2018.

The Annual Meeting has been called for the following purposes:

1.   To elect ten directors to serve forone-year terms (Proposal 1);

2.   To approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 2);

3.   To ratify the appointment by the Board of Directors of the firm of KPMG LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of Webster for the year ending December 31, 20172018 (Proposal 3); and

4. To vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the frequency of an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster (Proposal 4); and

5.   To transact any other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

If you vote using the enclosed proxy card, your shares will be voted in accordance with the instructions indicated. Executed but unmarked proxies will be voted:

1.   FOR the election of the Board’s nominees as directors;

2.   FOR the approval, on anon-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster;

3.   FOR the ratification of the appointment of Webster’s independent registered public accounting firm; and

4.  FOR the holding of an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster every year.firm.

Except for procedural matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors does not know of any matters other than those described in the Notice of Annual Meeting that are to come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the proxy will vote the shares represented by such proxy on such matters as determined by a majority of the Board of Directors. The proxies confer discretionary authority to vote on any matter of which Webster did not have notice at least 30 days prior to the date of the Annual Meeting.

The presence of a shareholder at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke that shareholder’s proxy. A shareholder may, however, revoke a proxy at any time before it is voted: (i) by delivering either a written notice of revocation of the proxy or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date to John H. Beers, Assistant Secretary, Webster Financial Corporation, 145 Bank Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702; (ii) byre-voting by telephone or on the Internet; or (iii) by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. The cost of soliciting

proxies for the Annual Meeting will be borne by Webster. In addition to use of the mails, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone or telecopy by directors, officers and employees, who will not be specially compensated for such activities. Webster also will request persons, firms and companies holding shares in their names or in the name of their nominees, which are beneficially owned by others, to send proxy materials to and obtain proxies from those beneficial owners and will reimburse those holders for their reasonable expenses incurred in that connection. Webster also has retained Morrow Sodali LLC, a proxy soliciting firm, to assist in the solicitation of proxies at a fee of $7,500 plus reimbursement of certainout-of-pocket expenses.

Who Can Vote - The securities which can be voted at the Annual Meeting consist of shares of Common Stock of Webster with each share entitling its owner to one vote on all matters properly presented at the Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting of shares. The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on February 27, 201726, 2018 as the record date for the determination of shareholders of Webster entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were 6,0175,698 holders of record of the 92,018,87692,035,665 shares of Common Stock then outstanding and eligible to be voted at the Annual Meeting.

Voting - If your Common Stock is held by a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., in “street name”), you should receive instructions from that person or entity that you must follow in order to have your shares of Common Stock voted. If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through a broker or another nominee, you may vote your shares of Common Stock:

Whichever of these methods you select to transmit your instructions, the proxy holders will vote your Common Stock in accordance with your instructions. If you give a proxy without specific voting instructions, your proxy will be voted by the proxy holders as recommended by the Board of Directors.

Vote by Telephone - If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can vote your shares of Common Stock by telephone by dialing the toll-free telephone number printed on your proxy card. Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 26, 2017. 25, 2018.Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares of Common Stock and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Internet - If you hold your Common Stock in your own name and not through your broker or another nominee, you can vote via the Internet. The website for Internet voting is printed on your proxy card. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day until 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 26, 2017.25, 2018. As with telephone voting, you will be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote via the Internet, you do not need to return your proxy card.

Vote by Mail - You can vote by mail by signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

Quorum and Vote Requirements -The presence, in person or by proxy, of at leastone-third of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual

2

Meeting. Assuming the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote. The affirmative vote of the majority of the votes cast is required to approve thenon-binding, advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster, to approve the non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of voting on the compensation of the named executive officers of Webster, and to ratify the appointment of Webster’s independent registered public accounting firm. Shareholders’ votes will be tabulated by the persons appointed by the Board of Directors to act as inspectors of election for the Annual Meeting.

2

BrokerNon-Votes and Abstentions -Under New York Stock Exchange Rule 452, which governs NYSE brokerage members, brokerage firms may not vote onnon-routine matters in their discretion on behalf of their clients if such clients have not furnished voting instructions. A “brokernon-vote” occurs when a broker’s customer does not provide the broker with voting instructions onnon-routine matters for shares owned by the customer but held in the name of the broker. Proposal 3 concerns a routine matter and thus brokerage firms may vote, in person or by proxy, on such proposal on behalf of their clients without voting instructions. Because none of the other matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting are considered routine matters under Rule 452, there potentially can be brokernon-votes at the Annual Meeting. Both abstentions and brokernon-votes will be treated as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and brokernon-votes will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast on Proposals 1 2, or 42 and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the votes for those proposals. Abstentions will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast on Proposal 3 and, therefore, will have no effect on the outcome of the vote for that proposal.

Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials - As a shareholder, you have the option of electing to receive future proxy materials (including annual reports) online over the Internet. This online service provides savings to Webster by eliminating printing, mailing, processing and postage costs associated with hard copy distribution. You may enroll for this service on the Internet after you vote your shares in accordance with the instructions for Internet voting set forth on the enclosed proxy card. You may also enroll for electronic delivery of future Webster proxy materials at any time on the Company’s website atwww.wbst.com. Under “Electronic Enrollment,” select the “Click Here To Enroll” link. Then select the box indicating your appropriate form of share ownership, and follow the instructions for electronic delivery enrollment. In the future, you will receive an email message, at the address you provided while enrolling, informing you that the Webster proxy materials are available to be viewed online on the Internet. Follow the instructions to view the materials and vote your shares. Your enrollment in electronic delivery of Webster proxy materials will remain in effect until revoked by you.

Annual Report on Form10-K - Webster is required to file an annual report on Form10-K for its 20162017 fiscal year with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Shareholders may obtain, free of charge, a copy of the Form10-K by writing to John H. Beers, Assistant Secretary, Webster Financial Corporation, 145 Bank Street, Waterbury, Connecticut 06702. Our annual report on Form10-K is available on the Company’s website,www.wbst.com.

3

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal 1)

At the Annual Meeting, ten directors will be elected to serve forone-year terms. Unless otherwise specified on the proxy, it is the intention of the persons named in the proxy to vote the shares represented by each properly executed proxy for the election as directors of the persons named below as nominees. The Board of Directors believes that the nominees will stand for election and will serve if elected as directors. If, however, any person nominated by the Board fails to stand for election or is unable to accept election, the proxies will be voted for the election of such other person as the Board of Directors may recommend. Assuming the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting, directors will be elected by a majority of the votes cast by shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. There are no cumulative voting rights in the election of directors.

As required by Webster’s Bylaws, directors must be elected by a majority of the votes cast with respect to such director in uncontested elections (number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director). In a contested election (a situation in which the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected), the standard for election of directors will be a plurality of the shares represented in person or by proxy at any such meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. In addition, under Webster’s Bylaws, incumbent directors nominated for reelection are required, as a condition to such nomination, to submit a conditional letter of resignation. In the event an incumbent nominee for director

3

fails to receive a majority of the votes cast at an annual meeting, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the resignation and make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation, or whether other action should be taken. The Board will act on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date the election results are certified. The director who failed to receive a majority of the votes cast will not participate in the Board’s decision.

Information as to Nominees

The following table sets forth the names of the Board of Directors’ nominees for election as directors, all of whom are current directors of Webster. Also set forth in the table is certain other information with respect to each such person’s age at December 31, 2016,2017, the periods during which such person has served as a director of Webster and positions currently held with Webster and its wholly owned subsidiary, Webster Bank, National Association (“Webster Bank”).

In keeping with Webster’s Qualification Guidelines for Board Members, Mr. JacobiShivery will be retiring from the Board effective with the 20172018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, as he will have reached the retirement age of 75.Meeting. He has served on the Board since 1993.2009, including as Chair of the Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors greatly appreciates Mr. Jacobi’s deep commitmentShivery’s service and extraordinaryhis many contributions to the Board and to Webster’s growth and progress.

4

Following the table are biographies of each of the nominees which contain information regarding each such person’s business experience, director positions held currently or at any time during the last five years, information regarding involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors to determine that such person should serve as a director as of the time of filing of this Proxy Statement. Each director brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board, giving the Board as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas, including corporate governance, board service, executive management, business, finance and marketing. The process undertaken by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in recommending qualified candidates is described beginning on page 1312 under “Corporate Governance - Director Qualifications and Nominations.”

4

William L. Atwellis managing director of Atwell Partners, LLC, a Darien, Connecticut based company which provides consulting services and market insights to the financial services industry. Mr. Atwell was President of CIGNA International at CIGNA Corporation from 2008 to 2012. Earlier in his career, Mr. Atwell held various senior positions with The Charles Schwab Corporation, including President, Individual Investor Enterprise and Schwab Bank. Mr. Atwell began his career at Citibank where he held various senior executive roles. He is Chairman of the Board of Blucora, Inc. (NASDAQ:BCOR), a provider of technology-enabled financial solutions headquartered in Bellevue, Washington.Irving, Texas. Mr. Atwell serves as an independent trustee of AQR Mutual Funds (AQR Capital Management LLC) and chairs its nominating and governance committee and is a member of its audit committee.and nominating and corporate governance committees. Mr. Atwell serves as a trustee and is the former Chairman (2012-2015) of the Fairfield University board of trustees. Mr. Atwell is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee.

5

Mr. Atwell’s role as a former President of CIGNA International and 35 years of executive experience in the retail financial services industry, including banking, brokerage and insurance, provides insight regarding Webster’s opportunities and challenges.

Joel S. Beckeris Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Torrco, a Waterbury, Connecticut based wholesale distributor of plumbing, heating and industrial pipe valve and fitting supplies to contractors and industry. Mr. Becker is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee.

Mr. Becker’s experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a local business in Webster’s market area combined with more than 2530 years of experience on Webster’s Board gives him unique insight into Webster’s challenges, opportunities and operations. He also has extensive experience in public company executive compensation as a result of his over nine years of service as Chair of the Compensation Committee.

John R. Ciulla is President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Webster and Webster Bank. He was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and a director of Webster in January 2018. Mr. Ciulla joined Webster in 2004 and has served in a variety of management positions at the Company, including Chief Credit Risk Officer and Senior Vice President, Commercial Banking, where he was responsible for several business units. He was promoted from Executive Vice President and Head of Middle Market Banking to lead Commercial Banking in January 2014, and to President in October 2015. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Ciulla was managing director of The Bank of New York, where he worked from 1997 to 2004. He serves on the board of the Connecticut Business and Industry Association (CBIA) and is the immediate past chairman. Mr. Ciulla is also a member of the board of the Business Council of Fairfield County.

Mr. Ciulla’s position and experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of Webster, and his day to day leadership of the Company, provide him with thorough knowledge of Webster’s opportunities, challenges and operations.

John J. Crawford is President of Strategem, LLC, a New Haven, Connecticut based company which provides consulting services to the business andnot-for-profit community on business and financial strategies. Mr. Crawford served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Aristotle Corporation, a New Haven, Connecticut based education training company from October 1992 through December 2002. Mr. Crawford continued to serve on the Board of Directors of Aristotle Corporation until August 31, 2005. From 1994 until December 2000, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the South Central Connecticut Regional Water Authority, New Haven, Connecticut. Mr. Crawford is Lead Director, Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee and the Executive Committee.

Mr. Crawford’s extensive executive and corporate governance experience as a former Chief Executive Officer of three companies, including a financial institution, and his 20 years of service on Webster’s Board, including fourteenfifteen years as the Lead Director, provides him with a seasoned view of Webster’s operations and challenges.

Elizabeth E. Flynn was Vice Chairman of Marsh, LLC in New York, New York, a global leader in insurance broking and risk management until her retirement on December 31, 2015. Ms. Flynn was President of

5

Marsh’s Insurance Services Group from September 2012 to May 2013, and CEO and President of Marsh U.S. Consumer from October 2011 to September 2012. From June 2010 to October 2011, she served as Global Chief Operating Officer at Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC. Earlier in her career, Ms. Flynn was Senior Vice President, Restructuring Office/Divestitures, at American International Group, and worked more than 20 years at JP Morgan Chase & Company in various senior executive roles. She is a director of StanCorp Financial Group, Inc. (NYSE: SFG), a publicly held insurance and financial services company headquartered in Portland, Oregon, and its subsidiary, Standard Insurance Company of New York. Ms. Flynn is a member of the Audit Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Ms. Flynn’s former role as Vice Chairman of Marsh, LLC and extensive operational and transformational leadership in numerous financial services organizations, including retail banking units while at JP Morgan Chase, brings meaningful and relevant experience to Webster.

Laurence C. Morse is the Managing Partner of Fairview Capital Partners, Inc., a West Hartford, Connecticut based investment management firm established in 1994 that oversees venture capital funds, some of which invest capital in venture capital partnerships and similar investment vehicles that provide capital primarily to minority-controlled companies. Mr. Morse is a director of the Institute of International Education, a member of the Board of Trustees of Harris Associates Investment Trust (which oversees the Oakmark Family of Mutual Funds), a member of the Board of Trustees of Howard University, and is a former director of Princeton University Investment Company and a former director and chairman of the National Association of Investment Companies, a private,not-for-profit trade association that represents 52 private equity and specialty finance investment firms. Mr. Morse is a member of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

6

Mr. Morse’s entire career has been spent in the investment management field, including as theco- founder and Managing Partner of an investment management firm, which provides the Board with extensive knowledge of the capital markets and accounting issues. His experience has made him adept at performing rigorous risk assessments of managers and management teams, and assessing new technologies, products and services, business strategies, markets and industries.

Karen R. Osar was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chemtura Corporation (NYSE:CHMT), a specialty chemicals company headquartered in Middlebury, Connecticut from 2004 until her retirement in March 2007. From 1999 to April 2003, Ms. Osar served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Westvaco Corporation and Mead Westvaco Corporation. She is a director and audit committee member of Innophos Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:IPHS), a publicly held specialty chemicals company headquartered in Cranbury, New Jersey, a director and audit committee member of Sappi Limited (JSE:SAP), a publicly held company and one of the largest global producers of coated paper and chemical cellulose, headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, and from 1999 through 2006 she served as a director and audit and finance committee chair of Allergan, Inc., a publicly held multi-specialty health care company focused on developing and commercializing pharmaceuticals. Ms. Osar is Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Risk Committee and the Executive Committee.

Ms. Osar’s experience as the former Chief Financial Officer of a public company, her previous corporate finance experience at JPMorgan Chase & Company, and her service as Chair of the Audit Committee for Webster and as the former chair of the audit committee of another public company, provides the Board with strong corporate finance and accounting experience. Her board committee service also provides corporate governance and executive compensation expertise.

Mark Pettie is President of Blackthorne Associates, LLC, a Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey based company which provides consulting services to firms investing in a wide range of consumer oriented businesses. Mr. Pettie served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:PBH), a publicly held company headquartered in Irvington, New York which develops, sells, distributes and marketsover-the-counter drugs, household cleaning products and personal care items, from January 2007 until September

6

2009. He was President of the Dairy Foods Group with ConAgra from 2005 to 2006. From 1981 to 2004, Mr. Pettie held various positions of increasing responsibility in general management, marketing and finance at Kraft Foods and was named Executive Vice President and General Manager of Kraft Food’s Coffee Division in 2002. He is Chair of the Risk Committee and a member of the Audit Committee and the Executive Committee.

Mr. Pettie’s former experience as Chief Executive Officer of a public company brings strong executive experience to the Board, along with his expertise in finance and marketing. He also has extensive business and corporate governance experience as a director for both public and private companies.

Charles W. Shiveryis former non-executive Chairman of the Board of Northeast Utilities (NYSE:NU) (now known as Eversource Energy). He joined Northeast Utilities in 2002 and was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2004 until April 2012, upon the completion of the merger with NSTAR, and then served as non-executive Chairman of the Board until October 2013. He previously held posts with the company including interim President, President-Competitive Group of Northeast Utilities, and President and Chief Executive Officer of NU Enterprises, Inc., the unregulated subsidiary of the Northeast Utilities system. Prior to that, he was co-president of the Constellation Energy Group, the parent company of Baltimore Gas & Electric and other energy related businesses. Mr. Shivery is a director and audit committee member of Portland General Electric Company (NYSE:POR), an electrical utility company headquartered in Portland, Oregon. He is Chair of the Compensation Committee, and a member of the Executive Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

7

Mr. Shivery’s former service as the President and Chief Executive Officer of an energy company provides extensive experience managing a sizable, highly regulated business. Northeast Utilities (now known as Eversource Energy), conducts business in a large part of the region serviced by Webster, so certain variables impact both businesses similarly. Mr. Shivery also provides the Webster Board with corporate governance and executive compensation knowledge.

Lauren C. Statesis anExecutive-in-Residence at Northeastern University’s D’Amore-McKim School of Business. Ms. States retired in 2014 from the IBM Corporation (NYSE: IBM), a publicly held company headquartered in Armonk, New York, after a career of more than thirty six years. Prior to her retirement, she served as Vice President, Strategy and Transformation for IBM’s Software Group and was a member of the Growth and Transformation senior leadership team. From 2008 to 2013, she was a leader in the company’s transformation to cloud computing and served as Chief Technology Officer in the corporate strategy function. Over her career, she has served in a broad variety of roles including technology, transformation, and sales and talent development. She is a director of Clean Harbors, Inc. (NYSE:CLH), a publicly held company headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, and is a member of the board of ScriptEd. She also serves as a Trustee for International House, New York. Ms. States is a member of the Audit Committee, and the Risk Committee.

Ms. States’ experience as former Chief Technology Officer of a public company, and her broad background in technology, strategy and transformation, provides Websterthe Board with strong executive and technology experience. She has a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight, issued by the NACD and Carnegie Mellon University.

James C. Smith isnon-executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Webster and Webster Bank.Bank and an advisor to the Company. Mr. Smith joined Webster Bank in 1975 and was appointed CEO of the bank and the holding company in 1987 and Chairman in 1995.1995, and served in those positions until his retirement in 2017. He was elected President, Chief Operating Officer and a directorDirector of Webster Bank in 1982 and of the holding company at its inception in 1986. He served as President of Webster and Webster Bank until 2000, and again from 2008 through2009 until 2011. Mr. Smith serves as Vice Chairman of the Midsize Banks Coalition of America. He is a past member of the board of directors of the American Bankers Association and served several years asco-chairman of the ABA’s American Bankers Council for midsize banks. He is a past member of the board of directors of the Financial Services Roundtable. Mr. Smith served as a member of the Federal Advisory Council, which advises the deliberations of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, and served on the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. He served on the board of directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. He served on the executive committee of the Connecticut Bankers Association. Mr. Smithco-chairs the Connecticut Governor’s Commission on Fiscal Stability and Economic Growth. He is also actively engaged in community service and supports numerous civic organizations including serving as General Chairman of the Hartford Bishops’ Foundation;Foundation, serving on the Trinity Health-NewHealth of New England Strategic Planning Committee;Committee, and serving until very recentlypreviously served as a member of the board of Saint Mary’s Health System board in Waterbury, Connecticut. Mr. Smith is Chair of the Executive Committee.

Mr. Smith’s position and extensive experience as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Webster and his day to day leadership of the Company provide him with thoroughthrough 2017 provides invaluable knowledge of Webster’s opportunities,operations, challenges and operations.opportunities.

The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of all of its director nominees.

87

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

General

The business and affairs of Webster are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). Members of the Board are kept informed of Webster’s business through discussions with the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and Webster’s other executive officers, by reviewing materials provided to them and by participating in meetings and strategic planning sessions of the Board and its committees. The Board is also kept apprised by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and management of continuing educational programs on corporate governance and fiduciary duties and responsibilities. In addition, new directors of Webster participate in an orientation program, which is designed to familiarize them with Webster’s business and operations and with their duties as directors under applicable laws and regulations. Each member of the Board also serves as a director of Webster Bank.

Webster believes in the importance of sound and effective corporate governance. Over the years, Webster has forged an explicit link between its corporate culture and corporate governance by identifying its core values, communicating them and living them every day. With uncompromising commitment to its core principles, Webster continues to add value for its customers, shareholders, employees and the communities it serves. The Board has adopted corporate governance practices and policies which the Board and senior management believe promote this philosophy. Certain of such practices and policies are listed in the chart below and certain of those listed are discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

Webster’s Commitment to Environmental, Social and Governance Issues

It’s in our DNA

Sustainability and commitment to community have been intrinsic to Webster since its founding. What is now known as Webster Bank was founded in 1935, during the Great Depression, by Waterbury, Connecticut native Harold Webster Smith. Mr. Smith started the bank with $25,000 borrowed from friends and family to help people buy and build homes.

Through the years that followed, Webster grew, reaching $1 million in assets by 1938. We were the first bank to offer GI and FHA loans in Connecticut and today we are a leading SBA lender to small businesses, women, and minority businesses. The Corporation’s dedication to the communities it serves remained strong after it went public in 1986. We continued to grow over the ensuing decades, broadening our geographic footprint to include Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New York, remaining headquartered in Waterbury. Today, we have more than $26 billion in assets.

8

The Webster Way – Values-Guided, Community-Minded

Webster remains a values-guided, community-minded bank focused on helping its customers achieve their unique goals. Putting people first, Webster bankers take the time to understand what matters most to our customers, responding with personalized solutions, and acting with responsibility, respect, ethical behavior, citizenship, and teamwork.

Every Webster banker is guided byThe Webster Way. It is our unshakeable core, the common bond we share as a values-guided, community-minded organization, and the principles we believe in and stand for every day. They bring us together, set us apart, and guide us in every action we take to live up to our customers:

The Webster Way also captures the essence of Webster’s commitment to its constituents – its customers, the communities where it does business, its employees, and its shareholders. As a matter of policy and longstanding practice, Webster engages in environmentally responsible practices at its facilities and enters into commercial loans with renewable energy and energy-efficient components; works ceaselessly to improve life in the communities it serves; provides an inclusive environment where bankers can continually grow professionally; and follows transparent governance practices to safeguard Webster for all of its constituencies.

Commitment to Excellence

Webster has been recognized for its commitment to excellence. In 2017, we were named one of the “most reputable banks” in the country, according to the 2017 Survey of Bank Reputations conducted by the independent organization Reputation Institute. The annual survey measures U.S. consumers’ perceptions of major bank brands. In addition, Webster earned the highest score of any Northeast-based bank and ranked seventh overall in the United States. In 2017, Webster was also named one of the top midsize employers nationwide, including recognition in the banking and financial services category, according to Forbes’ “America’s Best Employers of 2017.”

Webster’s Commitment to ESG

Webster’s inaugural “Environmental, Social and Governance Report” summarizes many of the ways Webster strives to be a good corporate citizen by conducting business in an environmentally responsible manner, being a caring neighbor and employer, and being as transparent as possible in its governance. It may be found on our website atwww.wbst.com.

Board Leadership

AtBeginning in 2018, Webster has separated the roles of Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer are combined, both held byofficer. Mr. Smith.Smith was appointednon-executive Chairman following his retirement on December 31, 2017, and Mr. Ciulla was appointed Chief Executive Officer. In addition, there is a lead independent director who is appointed in accordance with Webster’s Corporate Governance Policy, which provides that the Board shall appoint an independent director to serve as the Lead Director of the Board for aone-year term, or until a successor is appointed. The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of independent directors and assists and advises the Chairman of the Board. During fiscal year 2016,2017, Mr. Crawford served as the lead independent director. The Board believes that having a combined Chairman and principal executive officer, coupled with a lead independent director, is the most appropriate leadership structure for Webster, especially given Mr. Smith’s

9

long service as Chief Executive Officer and his extensive knowledge of the Company and its governance. This structure allows Board discussions regarding performance and strategic matters to be led by the person who oversees Webster’s strategy and operations and establishes a single voice to speak on behalf of Webster, while the lead independent director component of the structure provides independent leadership that mitigates any real or perceived conflicts of interest.

Director Independence

Pursuant to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards, Webster is required to have a majority of “independent directors” on its Board. In addition, the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee must be composed solely of independent directors. The NYSE listing standards define specific relationships that would disqualify a director from being independent and further require that for a director to qualify as “independent,” the board of directors must affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with the Company.

The Board, with the assistance of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, conducted an evaluation of director independence, based primarily on a review of the responses of the directors and executive officers to questions regarding employment and compensation history, affiliations and family and other commercial, industrial, banking consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and legal relationships with Webster, including those relationships described under “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Relationships” on page 4743 of this Proxy Statement, and on discussions with the Board.

As a result of this evaluation, the Board affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Atwell, Becker, Crawford, Jacobi, Morse, Pettie, Shivery and Mses. Flynn, Osar and States is an “independent director” for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE and applicable SEC rules and regulations. In connection with this evaluation, the Board considered that Webster provides lending and other financial services to directors, their immediate family members, and their affiliated organizations in the ordinary course of business and without preferential terms or rates. The Board also considered that C. Michael Jacobi’s son, Gregory Jacobi, was employed by Webster Bank in 2016 as a Senior Vice President. Mr. Jacobi’s son’s employment position with Webster Bank does not violate the independence standards contained in the NYSE rules and the Board determined that this relationship is not material and would not impair Mr. Jacobi’s independence, in part because Mr. Jacobi’s son is not an executive officer of Webster and his compensation and benefits were established in accordance with the compensation policies and practices applicable to Webster employees in comparable positions.

Mr. SmithCiulla is not considered independent because he is an executive officer of Webster and Webster Bank. Mr. Smith is not considered independent because he has been an executive officer of Webster within the past three years.

Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

In keeping with Webster’s Corporate Governance Policy, in 20162017 the Board held 45 meetings that were limited to independent directors. The lead independent director presides over the executive sessions of independent directors.

Risk Oversight

The Board administers its risk oversight function primarily through the Risk Committee, which is described in more detail below. The Risk Committee meets frequently throughout the year and reports its findings to the full Board on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Compensation Committee and the Risk Committee review and assess risks as related to Webster’s compensation programs. Webster also has a Chief Risk Officer, Daniel H. Bley, who reports in that capacity to the Risk Committee, as well as two senior risk officers who report to the Chief Risk Officer.

10

Board and Committee Meetings

During 2016,2017, Webster held 9 meetings of its Board. Each incumbent director attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings held by the Board during the period that the individual served and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which the individual served during the period that the individual served.

Committees of the Board; Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has established five standing committees. The standing committees are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Executive Committee and the Risk Committee. The Board has adopted a charter for each of these committees, as well as corporate governance guidelines that address themake-up and functioning of the Board and qualification

10

guidelines for board members. The Board has also adopted a code of business conduct and ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all employees, officers and directors. Each employee, officer and director participates in an annual training session that focuses on topics covered by Webster’s Code of Conduct. The training reinforces Webster’s core values and Webster’s commitment to full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. You can find links to these materials on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com.

You can also obtain a printed copy of any of the materials referred to above, without charge, by contacting us at the following address:

Webster Financial Corporation

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

Attn: Harriet Munrett Wolfe, Esq.

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

The Board has determined that all of the Directors who serve on the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees are “independent” for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE. In addition, all of the Directors who serve on the Risk Committee are “independent.”

Audit Committee

The Board has appointed an Audit Committee that oversees the Company’s financial reporting process, the system of internal financial and accounting controls, the audit process, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s annual financial statements, including management’s discussion and analysis, and regulatory examination findings. The Audit Committee recommends the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm and is responsible for the oversight of such firm. A copy of the Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at:www.wbst.com. During 2016, the Audit Committee held 5 meetings. The members of the Audit Committee currently are Ms. Osar (Chair) and Messrs. Crawford, Pettie, and Mses. Flynn, and States. Each of the members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Ms. Osar and Mr. Crawford qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee

The Board has appointed a Compensation Committee. During 2016, the Compensation Committee held 4 meetings. Compensation Committee meetings are attended by Webster’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President, other than while their compensation and benefits are discussed. For a description of the

11

role of Webster’s CEO in determining or recommending the amount of compensation paid to our named executive officers during 2016, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The members of the Compensation Committee currently are Messrs. Shivery (Chair), Atwell, Becker and Morse. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE, and also serves as the Compensation Committee of the Company’s subsidiary, Webster Bank. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at: www.wbst.com. The Compensation Committee may delegate to its chairperson or any other Compensation Committee member such power and authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, except such powers and authorities required by law to be exercised by the whole Compensation Committee or subcommittee thereof.

Pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s charter, among other responsibilities, the Committee is charged with annually reviewing and approving annual bonus arrangements and long term incentive compensation paid to the CEO. The Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the annual base salary, and severance and/or change in control or similar agreements/provisions, if any, for the CEO; annually determining such compensation and benefits for the members of the Company’s Executive Management Committee other than the CEO; annually recommending to the Board the content of the annual performance evaluation for the CEO and reviewing performance evaluations for all members of the Executive Management Committee; administering and implementing the Company’s performance based incentive plans; reviewing the talent management and succession planning processes to ensure that there is a pool of qualified candidates to fill future Executive Management Committee positions; and reviewing and approving on a periodic basis the Company’s employee stock ownership guidelines. The Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation.

For information on the role of compensation consultants determining or recommending the amount or form of executive or director compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Consultant.”

Executive Committee

The Board has appointed an Executive Committee that has responsibility for serving as an exploratory committee for mergers and acquisitions and to serve as anad hoccommittee as needed. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2016. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Smith (Chair), Crawford, Pettie, Shivery and Ms. Osar.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board has appointed a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that has overall responsibility for recommending corporate governance process and board operations for the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies director candidates, reviews the qualifications and experience of each person considered as a nominee for election or reelection as a director, and recommends director nominees to fill vacancies on the Board and for approval by the Board and the shareholders. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at:www.wbst.com. During 2016, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held 3 meetings. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Crawford (Chair), Morse, Shivery and Ms. Flynn. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE.

Risk Committee

The Board has appointed a Risk Committee whose primary function is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the Company’s enterprise risk management, receiving information regarding the Company’s policies, procedures and practices relating to risk, and discussing material regulatory

12

issues, compliance matters, and emerging risks to the Company. The Risk Committee also has responsibility for overseeing management’s monitoring of security issues. During 2016, the Risk Committee held 5 meetings. The members of the Risk Committee are Messrs. Pettie (Chair), Atwell, Becker, Jacobi, and Ms. Osar.

Director Qualifications and Nominations

Each year, the Board undergoes a self-assessment process to evaluate performance of the Board and Committees. As part of the self-assessment process, the Board considers which attributes and skill sets are important to ensure optimal performance of the Board. The information learned through this process is utilized when considering outside director candidates.

The Board believes that it should be composed of directors with diverse experience in business and in areas that are relevant to the Company, and that directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long term interests of the shareholders. Directors should also have an objective perspective and practical wisdom, and should be willing and able to devote the required amount of time to Webster’s business. In addition to depth and breadth of business and civic experience in leadership positons, a potential director’s ties to Webster’s markets are considered in order to ensure diversity and broad geographic and demographic representation reflective of the markets served. These attributes are embodied in Webster’s Qualification Guidelines for Board Members. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses the effectiveness of the Guidelines periodically.

The Board is committed to sustaining a board that achieves balance between depth of experience in the oversight of Webster and fresh approaches to oversight and strategic deliberations, particularly as Webster’s business and best practices of corporate governance evolve. Consistent with this commitment to constructive refreshment, Webster has added three new directors since 2014 and has had one director retire, with a second director retiring effective with the 2017 Annual Meeting. One result of the refreshment is a reduction in the median tenure of independent directors following the 2017 Annual Meeting to eight years.

When considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account a number of factors in addition to the foregoing competencies, including the following:

When seeking candidates for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others, including third party search firms. The Committee will review the qualifications and experience of each candidate. If the Committee believes a candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board, it will recommend to the full Board that candidate’s election.

Webster’s Bylaws permit shareholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting to make nominations for directors, provided such nominations are made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of Webster. To be timely, notice must be delivered to, or mailed to and received at, the principal executive offices of Webster not less than 30 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the meeting, provided that at least 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders. If less than 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be received by Webster not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the day on

13

which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting was made by the issuance of a press release on February 14, 2017 and by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2017. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for director suggested by shareholders applying the criteria for candidates described above and considering the additional information required by Article III, Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws, which must be set forth in a shareholder’s notice of nomination. Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws requires that the notice include: (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such person, and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including without limitation such person’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); and (b) as to the shareholder giving notice, (i) the name and address, as they appear on Webster’s books, of such shareholder, and (ii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such shareholder. In considering any nominees for directors recommended by a shareholder, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the same factors set forth above.

Compensation of Directors

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to Webster’s non-employee directors during 2016. Employee directors of Webster receive no additional compensation for serving as directors or committee members of Webster or its subsidiaries. Beyond these and other standard arrangements described below, no other compensation was paid to any such director.

14

Webster uses a combination of cash and restricted stock to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. Webster targets director compensation to be at the median for its peer group (as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below), with the opportunity to earn significantly more based on Webster’s total shareholder return. Stock Ownership Guidelines have also been established for directors to closely align directors’ interests with those of Webster’s shareholders.

During 2016, the methodology for non-employee director compensation was changed from paying an annual retainer and fees for each board and committee meeting attended, to paying an annual board retainer and annual committee retainers. In addition, non-employee directors received 1,710 shares of restricted stock, with the exception of Ms. States, who became a director on September 19, 2016, and received 1,110 shares. The Lead Director received 2,100 shares of restricted stock. All restricted stock vests after one year and has a two year holding period following the vesting period. Webster continued to reimburse directors for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attending Board meetings.

From January to April 2016, each non-employee director received $1,200 for each Webster or Webster Bank Board meeting attended, $1,200 for each committee meeting attended, and $600 for each telephonic Webster or Webster Bank Board and committee meeting called by either Webster or Webster Bank. Each non-employee director of both Webster and Webster Bank received a total of $2,000 for separate board meetings of Webster and Webster Bank that were held on the same day. Non-employee directors received $1,000 for attending a committee meeting if it was held on the same day as a Board meeting and $1,000 for attending a second committee meeting if more than one committee meeting was held on the same day.

From May to December 2016, the following schedule was in effect:

15

Webster stock ownership guidelines require non-employee directors to own Webster Common Stock with a market value equal to at least $300,000. Non-employee directors who do not meet the guidelines agree to hold all long term incentives, which include vested restricted stock and exercised stock options (net of exercise price and taxes), until they achieve the required ownership threshold of Webster Common Stock.

Communications with Directors

The Company’s shareholders and other interested persons who want to communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual Director, the Lead Director, the non-management directors as a group or any other group of directors, can write to:

[Name of Director or Directors]

c/o Lead Director of the Board of Directors

Webster Financial Corporation

145 Bank Street

Waterbury, Connecticut 06702

Attn: Harriet Munrett Wolfe, Esq.

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

The Board has determined that all of the Directors who serve on the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees are “independent” for purposes of Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE. In addition, all of the Directors who serve on the Risk Committee are “independent.”

Audit Committee

The Board has appointed an Audit Committee that oversees the Company’s financial reporting process, the system of internal financial and accounting controls, the audit process, and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s annual financial statements, including management’s discussion and analysis, and regulatory examination findings. The Audit Committee recommends the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm and is responsible for the oversight of such firm. A copy of the Audit Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at:www.wbst.com. During 2017, the Audit Committee held 5 meetings. The members of the Audit Committee currently are Ms. Osar (Chair) and Messrs. Crawford, Pettie, and Mses. Flynn, and States. Each of the members of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and that Ms. Osar and Messrs. Crawford and Pettie qualify as “audit committee financial experts,” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of RegulationS-K.

Compensation Committee

The Board has appointed a Compensation Committee. During 2017, the Compensation Committee held 5 meetings. Compensation Committee meetings are attended by Webster’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and President, other than while their compensation and benefits are discussed. For a description of the role of Webster’s CEO in determining or recommending the amount of compensation paid to our named executive officers during 2017, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The members of the Compensation Committee currently are Messrs. Shivery (Chair), Atwell, Becker and Morse. Each of the members of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE, and also serves as the Compensation Committee of the Company’s subsidiary, Webster Bank. A copy of the Compensation Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at:www.wbst.com. The Compensation Committee may delegate to its chairperson or any other Compensation Committee member such power and authority as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate, except such powers and authorities required by law to be exercised by the whole Compensation Committee or subcommittee thereof.

Pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s charter, among other responsibilities, the Committee is charged with annually reviewing and approving annual bonus arrangements and long term incentive compensation paid to the CEO. The Committee reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to the annual base salary, and severance and/or change in control or similar agreements/provisions, if any, for the

11

CEO; annually determining such compensation and benefits for the members of the Company’s Executive Management Committee other than the CEO; annually recommending to the Board the content of the annual performance evaluation for the CEO and reviewing performance evaluations for all members of the Executive Management Committee; administering and implementing the Company’s performance based incentive plans; reviewing the talent management and succession planning processes to ensure that there is a pool of qualified candidates to fill future Executive Management Committee positions; and reviewing and approving on a periodic basis the Company’s employee stock ownership guidelines. The Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to director compensation.

For information on the role of compensation consultants determining or recommending the amount or form of executive or director compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Consultant.”

Executive Committee

The Board has appointed an Executive Committee that has responsibility for serving as an exploratory committee for mergers and acquisitions and to serve as anad hoccommittee as needed. The Executive Committee did not meet during 2017. The members of the Executive Committee are Messrs. Smith (Chair), Crawford, Pettie, Shivery and Ms. Osar.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board has appointed a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee that has overall responsibility for recommending corporate governance process and board operations for the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies director candidates, reviews the qualifications and experience of each person considered as a nominee for election or reelection as a director, and recommends director nominees to fill vacancies on the Board and for approval by the Board and the shareholders. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s charter is available on the Company’s website at:www.wbst.com. During 2017, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held 2 meetings. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Crawford (Chair), Morse, Shivery and Ms. Flynn. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the rules of the NYSE.

Risk Committee

The Board has appointed a Risk Committee whose primary function is to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities regarding the Company’s enterprise risk management, receiving information regarding the Company’s policies, procedures and practices relating to risk, and discussing material regulatory issues, compliance matters, and emerging risks to the Company. The Risk Committee also has responsibility for overseeing management’s monitoring of security issues. During 2017, the Risk Committee held 5 meetings. The members of the Risk Committee are Messrs. Pettie (Chair), Atwell, Becker, and Mses. Osar and States.

Director Qualifications and Nominations

Each year, the Board undergoes a self-assessment process to evaluate performance of the Board and Committees. As part of the self-assessment process, the Board considers which attributes and skill sets are important to ensure optimal performance of the Board. The information learned through this process is utilized when considering outside director candidates.

The Board believes that it should be composed of directors with diverse experience in business and in areas that are relevant to the Company, and that directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long term interests of the shareholders. Directors should also have an objective perspective and practical wisdom, and should be willing and able to devote the required amount of time to Webster’s business. In addition to depth and breadth of business and civic

12

experience in leadership positons, a potential director’s ties to Webster’s markets are considered in order to ensure diversity and broad geographic and demographic representation reflective of the markets served. These attributes are embodied in Webster’s Qualification Guidelines for Board Members. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses the effectiveness of the Guidelines periodically.

The Board is committed to sustaining a board that achieves balance between depth of experience in the oversight of Webster and fresh approaches to oversight and strategic deliberations, particularly as Webster’s business and best practices of corporate governance evolve. Consistent with this commitment to constructive refreshment, Webster has added three new directors since 2014 and has had two directors retire.

When considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account a number of factors in addition to the foregoing competencies, including the following:

When seeking candidates for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may solicit suggestions from incumbent directors, management or others, including third party search firms. The Committee will review the qualifications and experience of each candidate. If the Committee believes a candidate would be a valuable addition to the Board, it will recommend to the full Board that candidate’s election.

Webster’s Bylaws permit shareholders eligible to vote at the Annual Meeting to make nominations for directors, provided such nominations are made pursuant to timely notice in writing to the Secretary of Webster. To be timely, notice must be delivered to, or mailed to and received at, the principal executive offices of Webster not less than 30 days nor more than 90 days prior to the date of the meeting, provided that at least 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders. If less than 45 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting is given or made to shareholders, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be received by Webster not later than the close of business on the 15th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the Annual Meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. Public disclosure of the date of the Annual Meeting was made by the issuance of a press release on February 14, 2018 and by filing a Current Report on Form8-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2018. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for director suggested by shareholders applying the criteria for candidates described above and considering the additional information required by Article III, Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws, which must be set forth in a shareholder’s notice of nomination. Section 13 of Webster’s Bylaws requires that the notice include: (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, (i) the name, age, business address and residence address of such person, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of such person, (iii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such person, and (iv) any other information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxies for election of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (including without limitation such person’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); and (b) as to the shareholder giving notice, (i) the name and address, as they appear on Webster’s books, of such shareholder, and (ii) the class and number of shares of Webster which are beneficially owned by such shareholder. In considering any nominees for directors recommended by a shareholder, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers, among other things, the same factors set forth above.

13

Compensation of Directors

The following table summarizes the compensation paid to Webster’snon-employee directors during 2017. Employee directors of Webster receive no additional compensation for serving as directors or committee members of Webster or its subsidiaries. Beyond these and other standard arrangements described below, no other compensation was paid to any such director.

Webster uses a combination of cash and restricted stock to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on the Board. Webster targets director compensation to be at the median for its peer group (as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below), with the opportunity to earn significantly more based on Webster’s total shareholder return. Stock Ownership Guidelines have also been established for directors to closely align directors’ interests with those of Webster’s shareholders.

In addition, to payment of annual board and committee retainers,non-employee directors received 1,281 shares of restricted stock. The Lead Director received 1,574 shares of restricted stock. All restricted stock vests after one year and has a two year holding period following the vesting period. Webster continued to reimburse directors for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attending Board meetings.

14

The following schedule was in effect in 2017:

Webster stock ownership guidelines requirenon-employee directors to own Webster Common Stock with a market value equal to at least $300,000.Non-employee directors who do not meet the guidelines agree to hold all long term incentives, which include vested restricted stock and exercised stock options (net of exercise price and taxes), until they achieve the required ownership threshold of Webster Common Stock.

Communications with Directors

The Company’s shareholders and other interested persons who want to communicate with the Board of Directors, any individual Director, the Lead Director, thenon-management directors as a group or any other group of directors, can write to:

[Name of Director or Directors]

c/o Lead Director of the Board of Directors

Webster Financial Corporation

P.O. Box 1074

754 Chapel Street

New Haven, Connecticut 06510

All communications received (except for communications that are primarily commercial in nature or relate to an improper or irrelevant topic) will be forwarded to the intended recipient(s) or the full Board, as appropriate.

Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

Webster typically schedules a meeting of the Board of Directors in conjunction with the annual meeting and expects that the Board of Directors will attend the annual meeting, absent a valid reason, such as a previously scheduled conflict. Last year all of the individuals then serving as directors attended the annual meeting.

1615

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

Named Executive Officers of Webster Financial Corporation

The following table sets forth information regarding the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers who were serving on December 31, 20162017 (the “named executive officers” or “NEOs”).

Provided below is biographical information for each of Webster’s NEOs, other than Mr. Smith.Smith and Mr. Ciulla. For information regarding Mr. Smith and Mr. Ciulla, see “Election of Directors-Information as to Nominees.”

John R. Ciulla is President of Webster and Webster Bank. Mr. Ciulla joined Webster in 2004 and has served in a variety of management positions at the Company, including Chief Credit Risk Officer and Senior Vice President, Commercial Banking, where he was responsible for several business units. He was promoted from Executive Vice President and Head of Middle Market Banking to lead Commercial Banking in January 2014 and President in October 2015. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Ciulla was managing director of The Bank of New York, where he worked from 1997 to 2004. He is the Chairman of the board of the Connecticut Business & Industry Association and serves on the board of the Business Council of Fairfield County.

Glenn I. MacInnesis Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Webster and Webster Bank. He joined Webster in 2011. Prior to that,joining Webster, Mr. MacInnes was Chief Financial Officer at New Alliance Bancshares for two years and was employed for 11 years at Citigroup in a series of senior positions, including deputy CFO for Citibank North America and CFO of Citibank (West) FSB. Mr. MacInnes serves on the boardBoard of Wellmore Behavioral Health, Inc.

Nitin J. Mhatre is Executive Vice President, Head of Community Banking of Webster and Webster Bank. He joined Webster in October 2008 as Executive Vice President, Consumer Lending of Webster Bank and was appointed Executive Vice President, Consumer Finance in January 2009. He was promoted to his current position in August of 2013. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. Mhatre worked at Citigroup across multiple geographies including St. Louis, Missouri, Stamford, Connecticut, Guam, USA and India, in various capacities. In his most recent position, he was the Managing Director for the Home Equity Retail business for CitiMortgage based in Stamford, Connecticut. Mr. Mhatre is a board member of Consumer Bankers Association headquartered in Washington, D.C., and also serves on the board of Junior Achievement of Southwest New England.

Daniel H. BleyChristopher J. Motl is Executive Vice President, and Chief Risk OfficerHead of Commercial Banking of Webster and Webster Bank since AugustBank. He joined Webster in 2004 and was responsible for establishing and growing the Sponsor and Specialty Banking Group and was most recently Executive Vice President and Director of 2010.Middle Market Banking. Prior to joining Webster, Mr. BleyMotl worked at ABN AMRO and Royal Bank of Scotland from 1990 to 2010, having served as Managing Director of Financial Institutions Credit Risk and Group SeniorCoBank, where he was Vice President Head of Financial Institutions and Trading Credit Risk Management.Relationship Manager. Mr. Bley currently servesMotl is on the board of Junior AchievementSpecial Olympics of Western Connecticut.Connecticut and the Travelers Championship.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee met with management to review and discuss the Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosures that follow. Based on such review and discussion, the Committee

17

recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Form10-K for its 20162017 fiscal year, and the Board has approved the recommendation.

Compensation Committee

Charles W. Shivery (Chair)

William L. Atwell

Joel S. Becker

Laurence C. Morse

16

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) discusses in detail the 20162017 executive compensation program for the Company’s NEOs. The Compensation Committee (“Committee”) recommends the base salary for the CEO to the Board of Directors, approves the annual cash incentive and long-term equity-based incentives (“LTI”) for the CEO, and approves the compensation for Webster’s other NEOs.Non-NEO members of the ExecutiveOperations Management Committee are also compensated under the same compensation program.

At the annual meeting of shareholders held on April 28, 2016,27, 2017, Webster held an advisory vote on executive compensation. Approximately 98%96% of the shares of Webster Common Stock that were voted on the proposal were voted for the approval of the compensation of the NEOs as discussed in Webster’s 20162017 Proxy Statement. The Committee considers the outcome of the vote when determining compensation policies and setting NEO compensation and believes that the results show strong support for Webster’s compensation policies and procedures. No changes in the overall structure of the programs were made in 2016.2017.

Executive Summary

Highlights of 20162017 Operating Performance

Webster reported record net income driven by higher revenue, disciplined expense management and further improvement in asset quality. Strong loan demand boosted core revenue. Webster purposefully investedcontinued its investment in key strategies that are expected to increase Economic Profit¹ over time.

Highlights Summary (results(GAAP results versus prior year)

On December 31, 2017, CEO James C. Smith retired from Webster. Mr. Smith’s career spanned 42 years, including 30 as CEO and the most recent 22 as Chairman & CEO. Mr. Smith will continue asNon-Executive Chairman and will serve on the Board of Directors. The details of Mr. Smith’s ongoing relationship with Webster were reported in the Company’s Form8-K filed on September 19, 2017, and are summarized later in this document.

On January 1, 2018, President John R. Ciulla succeeded Mr. Smith as the new CEO.

18

17

Overall loan growth of 8.6% with growth in commercial and commercial real estate loans of 13.2%

Setting 20162017 Compensation

In February 2016,2017, the Committee reviewed all elements of compensation for NEOs and approved the compensation structure. The program is intended to provide NEOs with a compensation opportunity commensurate with persons with similar duties and responsibilities at other financial institutions. In determining levels of NEOs’ overall compensation, the Committee also considers the qualifications and experience of the respective officer, Webster’s size and complexity of operations and, to a certain extent, the compensation paid to other persons employed by the Company. The Committee uses external data as input for the Committee’s analysis and to obtain a general understanding of current market compensation practices, rather than as strict rules for establishing compensation. A meaningful portion of pay is tied to financial and strategic performance. Consequently, actual compensation received will vary from targeted compensation.

Compensation Consultant

In carrying out its responsibilities, the Committee engages McLagan, an Aon Company (“McLagan”), an independent compensation consultant, to offer market perspectives on annual pay, current executive compensation trends and compensation programs currently in place at Webster. The consultant also provides insight into regulatory issues affecting compensation. The Committee has the authority to hire and terminate the consultant and determine the nature and scope of the consultant’s assignments. The Committee has engaged McLagan since June 2010. The Committee reviewed the work performed by McLagan and, under SEC and NYSE regulations, determined that the work did not create a conflict of interest.

20

McLagan provided the Committee ongoing insights relating to trends in executive compensation in the banking sector. At the direction of the Committee, McLagan reviewed all elements of compensation for the NEOs and other executive officers and made recommendations with regard to plan design. McLagan also reviewed an analysis of Webster’s 20162017 performance relative to peers and opined on management’s proposals to the Committee regarding 20162017 executive compensation. At the direction of the Committee, McLagan also provided data and best practices regarding the transition package and new pay structure for our newnon-executive Chairman and provided recommendations for the pay structure for our new President & CEO. McLagan attended all Committee meetings and in each one of those meetings had the opportunity to meet with the Committee in executive session. The Committee weighs the consultant’s perspective as part of its decision-making process. The Committee communicates compensation decisions directly to management. The Committee utilized market context and recommendations from McLagan when determining the amount and form of compensation paid to Webster’s executive officers and directors during 2016.2017.

Compensation Peer Group

The Committee uses a combination of proxy information forfrom the Peer Group and available market compensation survey data to review annually the compensation of Webster’s NEOs relative to comparable positions. This review is supplemented by available market survey data. The Committee may also use comparisons to the Peer Group to consider other market practices relevant to the scope of the NEOs’ responsibilities. This may include, for example, change in control provisions and stock ownership guidelines.

In 2016,2017, the Committee considered actual and, where available, target compensation data from the Peer Group.Group, along with available market compensation survey data. This data was presented by McLagan and contributed to an assessment of the competitiveness of actual and target pay for Webster’s NEOs.

21

The Committee reviews the composition of the Peer Group annually with the assistance of McLagan with the objective of maintaining a group of peer banks that individually and collectively represent suitable comparators for compensation-related analyses. Suitability is defined using a number of factors, including size, scope, business mix and geographic focus. Scope measures include total assets, net revenue, market capitalization and number of employees. Business mix is reflected by an analysis of loan composition (consumer, real estate, commercial and construction) and revenue composition (sources and proportion of net interest income

19

andnon-interest income). Banks with a geographic focus outside the continental United States are excluded regardless of the appropriateness of their scope and business mix. In late 2015,2016, at the request of the Committee, McLagan prepared an evaluation of our Peer Group for use in 2016.2017. As a result of the evaluation, a recommendation was made to add two companies to thethat our current Peer Group for 2016 - FNB Corporationmet the criteria stated above and Synovus Financial Corporation. Three companies were removed from the Peer Group due to those companies being acquired - Susquehanna Bancshares (acquired by BB&T), City National Corporation (acquired by Royal Bank of Canada) and First Niagara Financial Group (acquired by KeyCorp).no change was needed. The Committee approved the recommendation and identified the 12 companies listed below as the Peer Group for 2016:2017:

Elements of 20162017 Compensation

Webster’s compensation program has three basic elements: base salary, annual cash incentive and LTI. The annual cash incentive rewards current year performance, while the LTI aligns the NEOs’ interests with the long-term goals and performance of the Company. LTI grants consist of a 75%/25% mix of performance based shares and time-based restricted stock. Performance shares have a three-year performance period with cliff vesting, and time-based restricted stock has a three-year vesting schedule ofone-third on each anniversary date of the grant.

22

The Committee reviews all elements of compensation annually, separately and in aggregate, to ensure that the total amount of compensation is within appropriate competitive parameters based on data from independent sources and based on the performance of the Company and NEOs.

In early 2016,2017, the Committee engaged McLagan to provide an analysis of Webster’s total compensation as well as the individual components compared to the Peer Group and McLagan’s 20152016 Top Management Compensation Survey. This data contributed to an assessment of the competitiveness of actual and

20

target pay for Webster’s NEOs. Based on the findings, the Committee set the components of pay and the weight of each component creating a structure that reflects Webster’s objectives for compensation while allowing individual variations based on job scope, tenure, retention risk and other factors relevant to the Committee. See earlier section titled Objectives of Compensation Program for details.

The chart below breaks down target total direct compensation by component, including target and pay mix of each component by NEO for the program approved in February 2016.2017. For purposes of this table, “pay mix” represents the percentage of total direct compensation for each component.

Salary

Annual salary is the only fixed component of Webster’s executive compensation program. In setting salary, the Committee looks at current pay practices, Peer Group comparisons and general market analysis in consultation with its compensation consultant, McLagan. The Committee then establishes salaries that are competitive to the Peer Group and the external market for similar positions. The Committee reviews the salaries on an annual basis.

In the case of a change in role, an officer’s new responsibilities, external pay practices, internal equity, past performance and experience are all considered in determining whether a change in salary is warranted.

As part of the Committee’s annual salary review, salaries were determined to be reasonably competitive when compared with the actual proxy data of the Peer Group and benchmark survey information. In 2016, all of2017, Mr. Ciulla received significant pay increases as his responsibilities continued to grow. Mr. Motl was the NEOsonly other NEO who received an adjustment to base salary in 2017 and this took place as a resultpart of this review.his promotion to EVP, Commercial Banking.

Annual Cash Incentive Compensation - Compensation—Plan Overview

Annual cash incentive compensation is variable based on performance and ties a significant portion of the NEOs’ compensation to achievement of the Company’s annual financial plan and also considers financial performance relative to the Peer Group. The Committee approves measurements for the plan annually. For

23

2016, 2017, target incentives were set for each of the NEOs between 26% and 27% of total compensation. The plan is designed so that the weighted average performance for the financial measures must exceed a predetermined threshold before a payout can be made.

21

The plan is structured to calculate incentives based on two Primary Components:

The Corporate Component rating generates a potential funding of 0% to 150% of target. A score of 100% would pay out at target. There is an aggregate threshold score of approximately 70%, which generates a payout of 50% of target, below which no payout is earned. Scores below 50% on an individual measure are reduced to zero and a total weighted score below 50% on the four goals in the aggregate earns no payout.

The two Primary Components are weighted based on each NEO’s responsibilities. The weighting of the Primary Components is shown in the chart below:

2422

Annual Cash Incentive Scoring - Results

Corporate Financial Performance - Webster’s 20162017 results compared to plan are set forth in the table below. The Committee has discretion to make adjustments for extraordinary, unusual ornon-recurring items. For 2016,2017, no adjustments were made for three non-recurring items resulting in an adjustment of 2.5%.made.

Performance Relative to Peer Group – As previously described, the Committee has discretion to adjust the Corporate Component Score by plus or minus 20 percentage points based on Webster’s performance againstpre-established financial measures or performance relative to its Peer Group. The table below shows Webster’s performance relative to the twelve companies in the Peer Group.

25

The Committee recognized Webster’s continued strong and improving performance relative to the Peer Group, as Webster’s weighted score reached the 67^th percentile up from 62^nd the prior year, and determined that a positive adjustment of 3.0% was appropriate.

23

Final Corporate Component -The Committee determined that there would not be an adjustment for Performance Relative to Peer Group. The result is the final Corporate Component was determined by takingcomponent being equal to the Financial Performance score of 94.5% and adding the Committee’s adjustments for non-recurring items of 2.5% and Performance Relative to Peer Group of 3.0% which resulted in a final score equal to 100.0% of target.128.8%.

Line of Business Component - Given Mr. Motl’s responsibilities as the Head of Commercial Banking, and Mr. Mhatre’s responsibilities as Head of the Community Banking, line of business, 60% of his target annual incentive for each of them is payable based on the results of that line of business.business, where line of business results are based on 80% financial performance and 20% performance against strategic objectives.

Mr. Motl led Commercial Banking to record financial and operating performance delivering $109.9 million in Net Income and an 11.9% Return on Allocated Capital – resulting in a line of business financial score of 107.5%. Commercial Banking’s Economic Profit increased 18% over 2016 which was fueled by solid average loan balances that were up $787 million or 9.3% and ended the year at $9.3 billion. Additionally, deposits helped drive operating results with average deposit balances up 10.6% to end the year at $4.1 billion. Loan growth was driven by Sponsor & Specialty Finance (+12%) while deposit growth from Treasury & Payment Solutions (+15%) led all commercial business units. Commercial Banking continued to make significant progress on stated strategic initiatives: (i) expanding Commercial Real Estate, Sponsor & Specialty Finance and capital markets activities and capabilities; (ii) investing in treasury and payment products and services; (iii) delivering efficiencies through organizational alignment and process enhancements across the business line; and (iv) further aligning the Private Bank’s wealth activities with those in the business line. Commercial Banking recognized efficiencies in certain lines of business and utilized those efficiencies to invest in strategic initiatives, which is demonstrated by an efficiency ratio that only increased to 39.1% from 39.0%, after increased investment and related expenses. The Private Bank was integrated into Commercial Banking in April, resulting in a significant improvement in Private Bank financial performance and an increase in the level of quality referrals from Commercial Banking to the Private Bank. Credit quality continued strong with commercial classified,non-performing loans and net charge offs at low levels.

Mr. Mhatre continued to lead Community Banking along its Transformational Strategic Roadmap to deliverpre-tax,pre-provision net revenue of over $110$118 million, in 2016with year-over-year growth of 9% – resulting in a line of businesspre-tax,pre-provision financial score of 112%126%. Coupled with a strategic performance score of over 100%, the total line of business performance score closed at 121%. Community Banking continued to optimize its business model focused onand digitize processes by delivering automated, electronic, mobile services that meet rapidly changing preferences of consumers and businesses, while maximizingimproving high value customer share and customer satisfaction. Balances grew in each category with loans, deposits and investment assets under administration growingincreasing year over year with particular strong growth in business loansby 3%, 5% and business deposits. 201613%, respectively. 2017 was a record year for business loan originations. Banking Centers’

26

sales productivity grew year over year by 19 percent.growth in total balances, and average balances per household were up significantly, highlighting progress in growing high value relationships. Investments in electronic infrastructure continued to drive self-service as reflected in 16 percent growth in mobile banking customers. Nearly 70 percent70% of all balance changing transactions werebeing conducted through self-service channels.channels, and number of mobile banking customers growing by 11%. Efficiency improvement initiatives such as ‘Fast-Track’ business loans significantly reduced loan turn times, while improving corresponding customer demand. The most significant franchise-building initiative in 2016 was expansion in Boston where Community Banking opened 17 new Banking Centers to deliver all of Webster’s productsdemand, pull through rates and services to this high-growth, high-potential market.overall experience. The Boston expansion delivered approximately $200program balances grew to $425 million and $113$303 million in new deposits and loans in 2016, falling short of goal, thoughrespectively, consistent with our long-term prospects remain intact.goals for that market. Community Banking continued to maintain its ‘best-in-class’‘best-in-class’ customer satisfaction and net promoter scores.

27

20162017 Annual Cash Incentive Compensation Awarded in February 20172018

Individual NEO Performance - Individual performance is determined through the annual review process as part of the Company-wide performance management process. Each NEO is evaluated based on

24

achievement of individual performance objectives which include strategic goals, personal behavior, risk management, regulatory compliance and people leadership. The Committee evaluates the CEO, and the CEO evaluates the other NEOs in consultation with the Committee.

2825

20162017 Annual Cash Incentive Compensation - Upon completing the scoring of the two Primary Components (Corporate and Line of Business), the scores are applied to the CEO��sCEO’s and each NEO’s annual cash incentive target based on the weightings in the Weight of Primary Component Table to calculate the cash incentive awards. The Committee retains discretion to adjust the CEO’s calculated annual cash incentive award. The CEO retains discretion, in consultation with the Committee, to adjust the NEOs’ calculated annual cash incentive awards.

Discretionary Adjustment for Individual Performance -Based on the CEO’s assessment of each NEO’s individual performance measured against specific performance objectives and overall, the CEO may use discretion to determine a positive or negative adjustment to the calculated annual cash incentive award. Additionally, the CEO in consultation with the Chief RiskHuman Resources Officer and the Chief Human ResourcesRisk Officer considers potential adjustments (referred to as meaningful consequences) based on each NEOs record of identifying, managing and mitigating risk, including an assessment of outcomes in the areas of compliance, operating risk, credit, audit findings or regulatory citings, or other contributions that should be taken into account.

The Committee considers potential adjustments for the CEO based on his performance against performance objectives and his leadership of the Company. In addition, the Committee considers meaningful consequences adjustments to the CEO based on his record of managing and mitigating risk.

A thorough review of risk management in the areas of regulatory, internal audit, operating and credit compliance and Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) took place. As a result of the review, no downward adjustments were made to the annual cash incentive payments of the CEO or the NEOs.

The CEO, in consultation with the President, made the following positive adjustments to the calculated annual cash incentive awards for Messrs. MacInnes and Bley at the recommendation of the CEO and approval by the Committee and to Mr. Smith by the Committee, totaling $81,700. In addition, due to a correction of prior period performance related to the Company’s HSA Bank segment for 2015 and the first quarter of 2016, downward adjustments to all NEOs’ incentives were made to fully reflect the negative impact this correction had on 2015 Corporate STI results. This total adjustment was $32,125 for the NEOs and was deducted from their 2016 incentive payments. Finally, aMotl: A positive adjustment of $40,000 was made to Mr. Ciulla’sMacInnes’ incentive payment in recognition of his importantassistance in activities relating to the CEO succession. A positive adjustment was made to Mr. Motl’s incentive payment in recognition of his (i) strategic execution inbuilding-outand expanding our Sponsor and Specialty and Capital Markets businesses and capabilities, all of which created significant value to the franchise, and (ii) his successful integration of the Private Bank into Commercial Banking which resulted in increased profitability for the bank and an expanded leadership contributions in his expanded role as President.for Mr. Motl.

20162017 Final Payment Determination -–The Committee determines and approves the short-term incentive award for the CEO and reviews and approves the short-term incentive awards that are recommended by the CEO for the other NEOs.The final tabulations for annual cash incentive compensation are set forth below:

Long-Term Incentive Compensation -– Plan Overview

Long Term Incentive Vehicles:Webster awards two forms of LTI grants, performance shares and restricted stock as displayed in the table below:

Performance Shares: Performance Shares vest at the conclusion of the three-year performance period and the Committee certifies the results based 50% on Company three-year total shareholder return relative to Webster’s Peer Group and 50% on the three-year average return on equity compared to plan. Performance must meet threshold levels or the shares are forfeited.

The Company does not vest performance based restricted stock for performance below threshold. A threshold level of performance must be met for each metric in order for payment to be earned. Once threshold performance is achieved, actual awards will be interpolated between threshold and 150% of target.

The Committee may increase or decrease the CEO’s LTI or the other NEOs’ LTI based on a variety of factors including the Company’s prior year performance against financial and strategic goals. The Committee determines the recommended grant for the CEO and reviews and approves the CEO’s recommendation for the other NEOs.

27

Long Term Incentive Compensation Awarded in February 2017

This table is not required but we included it because our 2017 grants are based in part on 2016 performance.

30

2017 Long Term Incentive Grant - TheLTI grants made in February 2017 LTI grants were made in the form of 75% Performance Shares and 25% time-vested restricted stock, as described above, based in part on each NEO’s 2016 performance and granted based on the NEOs’ 2016 base pay and LTI target percent. The Committee approved grants at 100% of target for Mr. Smith and, based on Mr. Smith’s recommendation at 100% of target for Messrs. MacInnes, Ciulla, Mhatre and Bley. The individual performance of each NEO on which the February 2017 grants were based is describedas shown in the NEO’s Performance Summary for 2016 table.chart below.

Two-year Supplemental SummaryLong Term Incentive Compensation TableAwarded in February 2018

This table is not required but we included it because our 20172018 grants are based in part on 20162017 performance.

2018 Long Term Incentive Grant - The February 2018 LTI grants were made based in part on each NEO’s 2017 performance and granted based on the NEOs’ 2017 base pay and LTI target percent. The Committee approved grants as shown in the table below.